Oh My Gamer
Oh My Gamer

Gaming news, in your language

Sunday, 27 September 2026
Home>US Court Awards Nintendo $4.5 Million in Piracy Ca…

US Court Awards Nintendo $4.5 Million in Piracy Case Against Redditor

·1 min read

Written with artificial intelligence.

US Court Awards Nintendo $4.5 Million in Piracy Case Against Redditor

A US District Judge has ordered James Williams, known as 'Archbox' on Reddit, to pay Nintendo $4.5 million due to his involvement in a piracy network for Nintendo Switch games. Williams, who did not respond to the lawsuit, was found liable for facilitating the distribution of pirated titles.

Default Judgment Against Williams

A US District Judge has ruled in favor of Nintendo, granting the company a default judgment of £3.4 million ($4.5 million) against James Williams, a former Reddit moderator known by the username 'Archbox'. This ruling comes after Williams failed to respond to a lawsuit alleging his involvement in piracy related to Nintendo Switch games.

Allegations of Piracy

Nintendo accused Williams of facilitating a network of unauthorized online 'shops' that offered extensive libraries of pirated Nintendo Switch games. The lawsuit revealed that Nintendo was seeking $4.5 million in damages, specifically requesting $150,000 for each of the 30 games involved, which included popular titles like The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom and Mario Kart 8 Deluxe.

US Court Awards Nintendo $4.5 Million in Piracy Case Against Redditor
Image generated with AI

Court's Ruling

The judge acknowledged that Williams likely knew about the lawsuit, as he had previously engaged a lawyer to contest a Google subpoena. The court emphasized the severity of Williams' actions, stating that his "egregious infringement activities merit substantial punishment." Along with the financial judgment, the court issued a permanent injunction prohibiting Williams from distributing any pirated Nintendo games and from encouraging others to do so.

Context of the Case

This ruling follows Nintendo's ongoing efforts to combat piracy, including previous actions against other individuals involved in similar activities. The judge recognized Nintendo's decision not to seek additional DMCA damages or attorney fees as a reasonable gesture that supported the maximum award for copyright infringement.

NintendoSwitchPiracyLawsuitCourt
← Back to homepage